|
Surgery Conference Room, 4:00
p.m.
Present (underlined) were: Reid Adams, Eve Bargmann,
Robert Bloodgood, Anita Clayton, Gene
Corbett, Carl Creutz, Donald Innes (Chair),
Vern Juel, Howard Kutchai, Chris Peterson, Jerry Short,
Linda Watson, Bill Wilson, Brian Wispelwey,
John Bell, Sarah Jones, Maria Meussling, David Shonka,
Guests: Elizabeth Bradley, Evan Heald, John
Jackson, Nancy Payne, Debra Reed
(secretary)
-
Contemporary Clerkship/Elective/Selective. The
development team is making progress and will work toward having a plan
in place by February/March, 2004 with implementation in 2005. The
“plan” is still in the discussion/development stage and comments from
interested faculty are welcomed. A clear sense of the 2005-2006
clerkship/selective/elective year will be needed for a late winter
retreat.
The 2004-2005 Clerkship schedule is approved with minor changes from
the previous year. See attachment.
-
All curriculum development teams will be encouraged to keep the
LCME data collection standards and questions in mind when
working on their various projects. See LCME – database
http://www.lcme.org/database.htm section 2 of the
2004-05 most recent edition.
-
Clerkship Clinical Skills Teaching & Assessment
Project. Members of the development team, Eugene Corbett,
Elizabeth Bradley, Evan Heald, John Jackson, and Nancy Payne met with
the Committee to discuss the project. A grant from HRSA Bureau of
Health Professions funds the project. The project has three major
goals, 1) to develop and integrated skills teaching program, 2) to
assess the clinical skills of medical students, and 3) to develop
online support capability.
The project is working on developing clinical skills workshops for
clerkships such as Internal Medicine, AIM, Family Medicine and
Pediatrics. A set of criteria will be developed to maintain
consistency and quality control. The team will develop and
implement appropriate clinical skills testing methods for
students. A website will be designed to relay teaching
information and help with the student assessment.
Workshop criteria:
The purpose of the workshops is to enable each student to acquire
hands-on competency in the performance of selected skills commonly
applied in day to day clinical practice. The underlying goal is to
create an overall program of clinical learning which nurtures in the
student the kind of competence and confidence that comes from knowing
how to actually do clinical work. The clinical skills for these
sessions are selected for their relevance to basic clinical skill
learning, and for their practical applicability to contemporary
clinical practice. Because of the fact that they are intended to be
proficiently learned at the clerkship level, they also serve the
purpose of training the student to participate more effectively in the
care of patients.
Essential characteristics of a clinical skills workshop
include:
-
format & content be designed to enhance skill acquisition (not
merely knowledge transfer from teacher to student);
-
format be designed for interactive student participation
throughout the workshop session;
-
content be case-based;
-
format & content be planned at the outset so that it can
change in response to evaluation and feedback from students and other
pertinent observers;
-
the workshop can be given in a 60 to120 minute time period;
-
recommended that the workshop be designed such that should the
need arise, a colleague could lead the workshop in the absence of the
workshop leader.
The Clinical Skills Assessment – first pilot OSCE was
November 17, 2003 and focused
on:
-
Health care literacy (communication)
-
Teach correct peak pulmonary flow technique
-
Perform a standard electrocardiogram
-
Phone triage an infant with fever
-
Perform a standard blood pressure
-
Examine the knee for ligamentous/meniscal normality
-
Examine for a cardiac gallop
The master clinical skills website plan includes:
-
Clinical skills teaching sessions and related educational
materials;
-
Capability for online student evaluation of CS teaching
sessions;
-
Student clinical skills performance database (for administrative
analysis, research);
-
Longer term educational outcome database;
-
Overall program evaluation
Dr. Corbett distributed outcome data from a clinical skills
improvement project at Maastricht Medical School in the
Netherlands. Improvement was evident secondary to the project. A
poll of University of Virginia School of Medicine showing student’s
confidence levels in various clinical skills was also
distributed.
The Committee supports the Skills Project agreeing that increasing
skills levels will not take time from “knowledge” learning, but will
enhance the curriculum, improving both medical knowledge and clinical
skills.
Donald Innes/dmr
|